I like this statement by Pablo Escobar’s son that “we all have nuclear energy … we all are potential criminals”.
If you haven’t yet read the story of this son of a gunslinger trying to seek mercy for his dad’s sins, from his victim’s children, please read this.
I am still not sure about the intentions of Sebastian Marroquin, the son of perhaps the most feared-hated and the most powerful drug lord in recent times. His dad was, as most of us know, the head of the Medellin Cartel, which they say had an 80% share of the world’s cocaine trade in the late 1980s, most of which was meant for consumption in the US, a sober country with an even more sober foreign policy. Poor guys, they didn’t deserve to be over-fed!
Escobar, we all know, died a fart of a death in 1993 after enjoying ruthless power for years in Latin America, especially Colombia, the country of Gabriel Garcia Marquez (his novel (reportage), News of a Kidnapping, will give you a fish-eyed-view of how much the icon-writer himself is enamoured of the lives of criminals like Escobar). I believe it is in that country’s culture to respect such people. For that matter, it is in every country’s culture, every regions’… some of you may get a fair idea of where I am headed to
)
I still can feel the weight of that statement—we could’ve been criminals. It is that we tend to divert our energy to doing things that we assume are productive and creative. Nuclear energy, he said that, and we all have it.
Having said that, I don’t know whether this son—who looks like an alcoholic with a insatiable appetite for beef and bimbos—is trying to lure the world into believing that his father’s sins are just his father’s and not his. We know that sons of such monsters enter the fray much early—in fact, they are taught and trained to. Any resemblance of that training at some our own family-dominated (non-narcotic) business houses is inescapable. Sixteen was what Juan Pablo Escobar, now Sebastian, was when the cartel his father built was crushed to pieces and pieces and pieces. At that age he was too young to be a drug lord, but old enough to be the drug lord’s scheming, womanising son. Yes, I know these people!
I will give him benefit of the doubt, but a senior police officer in Bogota won’t: he says the son was also directly involved in the drug business, killings, etc.
Well, diversifying the way you do business from criminal activities to something that is seen as acceptable (despite all its meaningless) is what Micheal did after Godfather Corleone died. But Sebastian, unlike Michael, in no fictional character with a touch of reality–he is a real character with a touch of fiction that the media is foisting on him, that’s what I feel. And that makes a sea of difference. Also, Michael’s dad, Godfather, was against drugs and that, even as mere posturing, helps (in hindsight) elevate your social ranking (CSR will take care of the rest). Again, Sebastian, if he intends to build a business empire, will have to start from scratch. But as someone said, nothing is impossible!
Now, all that thing about the late Don calling Sebastian “my 14-year-old pacifist son” because he allegedly “challenged” his father over killings, etc. looks like fiction to me. I know these are the phrases (from the stupid horse’s mouth) that most feature writers fall for—to please their editors (who think they are the next big thing after Truman Capote or John Updike or Tom Wolfe).
Finally, coming back to the statement that “we are all potential criminals”, I guess we can take him without a pinch of salt.
It is true of (maybe) you and (certainly) me.